The United States has a crisis of representation in government. Women are 51% of the population; yet only hold 27% of seats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Over the last decades, a myriad of training programs, including leadership development programs, have been created specifically toward getting more women elected. Even with these increased resources to support women running for office, at our current rate we won’t reach gender parity in political leadership in our lifetimes. In the year 2000, the United States ranked 46th globally for women’s representation in government at the national level, now the U.S. ranks 67th, alongside Mali, Kazakhstan, Bulgaria, and Afghanistan. And the U.S. ranks well behind most well-established democracies in the OECD.
In other words, 66 countries have outpaced the United States in women’s representation – not because their women are more qualified or ambitious, but because they have implemented electoral systems and policies to ensure more level playing fields and greater opportunity in the electoral process. Consider New Zealand, a country often lauded for increasing women in leadership since adapting their electoral system from the “first past the post” model to the more modern mixed member proportional system. Similarly, in the nation of Georgia, political parties are incentivized to recruit more women and receive state funding for doing so, while in Ireland, political parties lose funding for failing to recruit enough women to represent their party. The evidence is clear – if our nation wants to accelerate greater gender representation and demonstrate that we truly value women’s political leadership, we need both leadership development programs and changes to our political and electoral systems. The history of women’s representation best demonstrates this need.
In 1992, for the first time in the history of the U.S., women ran for and were elected to Congress at the highest rate of any decade. The year became known as the “Year of the Woman” and set in motion women’s most recent political gains. During this same period, our government failed to change policies and voting systems to make it more equitable for women to run. For instance, it was only in 2018 that women running for federal office were allowed to use campaign funds to cover childcare expenses. This important policy still isn’t in place in most states. In the year 2021, 29 years after the “Year of the Woman,” it is hard to imagine that women are still fighting these same battles.
Many have touched on the history made with Joe Biden’s selection of Kamala Harris as his vice presidential running mate. One hundred years after the 19th Amendment granted many women the right to vote, Harris is the first woman of color and the fourth woman overall to be on a major party ticket for a presidential election. While no woman has served as the U.S. President, 13 countries around the world have women heads of state. Along with becoming one of a small handful of women to be featured on the ballot during a presidential election, Harris’ nomination illustrates the unique power executive leaders have to accelerate gender equality and parity by appointing women as running mates and to key leadership positions. Local, state, and national appointmented positions often perform a great deal of government work – writing policies, making decisions, presenting ideas, and so forth. More women in these roles increases women’s influence in the policymaking process.
While other countries have adopted innovative strategies to improve women’s representation, lawmakers in the U.S. have done little to address the constraints of our system. Additionally, more than 100 countries have implemented targeted recruitment practices for women to increase the number of women who run in the first place. In the U.S., women’s moderate successes in spite of these institutional barriers remain uneven across ideology, age, geography class, and race.
The ReflectUS Coalition’s work on systemic change runs the gamut: we believe that every person and institution plays an important role in this work. Political parties must commit to recruiting women to run for office and commit to gender equality standards. Political donors can put their resources behind women early on in primaries and later in general elections to ensure women have the funding they need – funding that attracts other donors to contribute. Individuals can donate, volunteer, and vote for women who are running for office. Those in charge of appointments to Boards and Commissions must commit to gender-balanced appointments. There are also policy approaches that would greatly accelerate women’s political leadership such as modernizing legislative workplace norms with onsite childcare, paid leave, and proxy voting so women can serve effectively and rise to leadership positions.
Without women, we are missing a vital opportunity to address real concerns for more than half the population in the United States. Gender equality should not be reliant on the success of one party over another; for equality to be achieved and sustained it must happen across the ideological, racial, economical, and geographical spectrum. As we move beyond the Suffrage Centennial and celebrate the women leaders who made the 19th Amendment possible, we must harness the energy for change and hunger for women’s representation on the ticket and in the cabinet and commit to systems changes which will last longer than a presidency.
Tiffany Gardner is the CEO of ReflectUS, a national coalition of nine leading women’s representation movement organizations working to accelerate gender parity.
Cynthia Richie Terrell is the Executive Director and Founder of RepresentWomen, a member of ReflectUS.